From beginning to end, others function as the path builds, if you are going to make works that are themselves mass-produced, heavily marketed substitutes for true artisan practices. Last year I made anything, there was never any animosity. We were, however, branching away from one to three years, using texts as diverse as the figure, with the task; a white acrylic field, forming a homogeneous whole. Working with second-hand women's clothing in various shades of white in thoughts.
Wait what? What did you just read?
I ask myself the same thing after I read a lot of real-life artist statements too similar to the above.
It's okay. It's supposed to be farce. Exactly like too much similar writing about art is not--not intentionally anyway.
Folks have studied and named the fugly beast which is such writing. It is International Art English, or IAE.
A good artist statement may be:
A bad artist statement probably:
This page randomly selects and serves pre-generated farcical artist statements, many of which were created with computer assistance; for example by statistical sentence recombobulation: training an AI on actual IAE, then having it gurgitate similar stuff.
The statements, being AI-generated, are by nature (and if human-created, by dedication) in the Public Domain.
To get another statement, reload the page.
This "statement" is from this source file:
FGXr46bHkGrKwSD2vb2z_generated_IAE_gibberish__2016_01_06__23_10_48__045890.txt
This page doubles as an API. To get a plain-text statement without this explanation, call the page with any GET variable declared, like this:
http://earthbound.io/data/gibberish-artist-statements/index.php?gib=florf
To contribute to these entertainments, clone the git repository, do your stuff and submit a pull request.
Back to index