As shown by my work first presented in the Daum Museum of Art History and Theory in Utrecht, /Made in Commons/ is the function of design. My Lectures at the America Library in Prishtina together with a hybrid oeuvre in which traditional and modern art, and various cultural parties and special surprise performances in the museum’s permanent collection, together with the significance of conceptual and pop-cultural motifs and the Polish Institute Berlin and beyond, exhibit artists themselves who, for the Arts, with the Conseil général de la Durantaye, discusses friendship with Sloan Rankin-Keck, a model like a car in the contemporary art profession, and for those of us who seem not so interested in exploring painting as in shooting.
Wait what? What did you just read?
I ask myself the same thing after I read a lot of real-life artist statements too similar to the above.
It's okay. It's supposed to be farce. Exactly like too much similar writing about art is not--not intentionally anyway.
Folks have studied and named the fugly beast which is such writing. It is International Art English, or IAE.
A good artist statement may be:
A bad artist statement probably:
This page randomly selects and serves pre-generated farcical artist statements, many of which were created with computer assistance; for example by statistical sentence recombobulation: training an AI on actual IAE, then having it gurgitate similar stuff.
The statements, being AI-generated, are by nature (and if human-created, by dedication) in the Public Domain.
To get another statement, reload the page.
This "statement" is from this source file:
generated_IAE_gibberish__2016_01_02__02_47_42__278293.txt
This page doubles as an API. To get a plain-text statement without this explanation, call the page with any GET variable declared, like this:
http://earthbound.io/data/gibberish-artist-statements/index.php?gib=florf
To contribute to these entertainments, clone the git repository, do your stuff and submit a pull request.
Back to index